'a numbing detachment from others and a self-destructive disposition toward the world.' (West, p. 23). Is clearly the first; the second is a bit more debatable. At face value, there's some sense of male empowerment here and invocation of 'revolution.' But both are arguably purely rhetorical and self-defeating, especially in comparison with peers such as Public Enemy.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete'a numbing detachment from others and a self-destructive disposition toward the world.' (West, p. 23). Is clearly the first; the second is a bit more debatable. At face value, there's some sense of male empowerment here and invocation of 'revolution.' But both are arguably purely rhetorical and self-defeating, especially in comparison with peers such as Public Enemy.
ReplyDelete